Method and system for enabling privacy in an application using fully homomorphic encryption

ABSTRACT

The disclosure herein generally relates to the field of privacy preserving in an application, and, more particularly, to enabling privacy in an application using fully homomorphic encryption. The disclosure more specifically refers to enabling a most optimal FHE for privacy preserving for the application based on a set of constraints using a disclosed set of optimization tasks. The set of optimization tasks comprise a multi objective-multi constraint optimization task and a single objective-multi constraint optimization task, that identifies an optimal FHE library, along with an associated FHE functionality and an optimal configuration of the associated FHE functionality based on the set of constraints. The identified FHE library along with the associated FHE functionality and the optimal configuration of the associated FHE functionality facilitate optimal implementation of privacy in the applications.

PRIORITY CLAIM

This U.S. patent application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to:India Application No.202021028022, filed on Jul. 1, 2020. The entirecontents of the aforementioned application are incorporated herein byreference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The disclosure herein generally relates to the field of privacypreserving in an application, and, more particularly, a method and asystem for enabling privacy in an application using fully homomorphicencryption (FHE).

BACKGROUND

Data driven digital transformation has led to exponential increase ofdata. The exponential increase in data has increased dependence on cloudservice providers (CSPs). Organizations are embracing cloud computingservices to outsource storage and computations which can be efficientlymanaged with low cost over-head. With the increased dependence on cloudcomputing services, there is a growing concern for privacy of data asthe data is stored and processed on third party cloud service providers.Of many solutions that enable privacy preserving computations on CSP,fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) is a promising solution. The FHEenables organizations to securely outsource data storage to CSPs whilestill allowing computations on the encrypted data without the need fordecryption.

Machine learning (ML) provides an ability to automatically learn andimprove from feedback or experience without the need for explicitprogramming. However, existing ML models operate at the cost of a user'sdata privacy as sensitive data is stored at third party organizations orthird party cloud service providers, without any safeguards from theservice provider. Hence there is a demand to enable privacy of client'sdata, for which there is a need to perform privacy enabled MachineLearning or privacy preserving machine learning (PPML).

The existing state of art techniques for implementing PPML focuses onimplementing PPML models to solve specific problems such as privategenomic sequencing or encrypted computation on genomic data and so on inprivacy preserving manner. However these PPML techniques are optimizedfor a specific given use-case. Further the PPML techniques involveseveral complicated parameters and for the PPML technique to beefficient it is necessary to select the right parameters and theoperating range of the selected parameters. Therefore, there is a needfor generic framework that enables end-users to select an appropriatePPML scheme and its parameter set based on the requirements of the PPMLapplications.

SUMMARY

Embodiments of the present disclosure present technological improvementsas solutions to one or more of the above-mentioned technical problemsrecognized by the inventors in conventional systems. For example, in oneembodiment, a method and a system for enabling privacy in an applicationusing fully homomorphic encryption is provided.

In an aspect a method for enabling privacy in an application using fullyhomomorphic encryption is provided. The method includes receiving, via aone or more hardware processors, the application, a set of input data tothe application, a set of constraints and a user requirement, whereinthe set of input data are indicative of one or more functions performedby the application, the set of constraints are indicative of functionalperformance and cost of the application, and the user requirement isindicative of an optimization task to be performed as per a user'srequirement. The method further includes generating, via the one or morehardware processors, a set of inter-connected meta models based on anabstract data type (ADT) technique, wherein the set of inter-connectedmeta models comprises a plurality of meta model trees, wherein each ofthe plurality of meta model trees comprises a plurality of nodes thatindicate a fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) library, a FHEfunctionality associated with the FHE library and an optimalconfiguration of the associated FHE functionality. The method furtherincludes generating, via the one or more hardware processors, a set ofinstance models for the application based on the set of constraintsusing the set of inter-connected meta models, wherein each of the set ofinstance models comprises an FHE library, the FHE functionalityassociated with the FHE library and the optimal configuration of theassociated FHE functionality identified from the meta models based onthe set of constraints. The method further includes optimizing, via theone or more hardware processors, each of the set of instance modelsbased on the optimization task to obtain a decision for each of the setof constraints, wherein the optimization task is identified from a setof optimization tasks based on the user requirement, the set ofoptimization tasks comprises one of a multi objective-multi constraintoptimization task and a single objective-multi constraint optimizationtask. The method further includes identifying, via the one or morehardware processors, a pre-defined number of optimal instance modelsfrom the set of instance models using a ranking technique, wherein theranking technique is performed based the set of constraints. The methodfurther includes displaying, via the one or more hardware processors, anoptimal instance model, wherein the optimal instance model is indicativeof the privacy preservation using FHE to be enabled in the application.

In another aspect, a system for enabling privacy in an application usingfully homomorphic encryption is provided. The system is configured forreceiving the application, a set of input data to the application, a setof constraints and a user requirement, wherein the set of input data areindicative of one or more functions performed by the application, theset of constraints are indicative of functional performance and cost ofthe application, and the user requirement is indicative of anoptimization task to be performed as per a user's requirement. Thesystem is further configured for generating a set of inter-connectedmeta models based on an abstract data type (ADT) technique, wherein theset of inter-connected meta models comprises a plurality of meta modeltrees, wherein each of the plurality of meta model trees comprises aplurality of nodes that indicate a fully homomorphic encryption (FHE)library, a FHE functionality associated with the FHE library and anoptimal configuration of the associated FHE functionality. The system isfurther configured for generating a set of instance models for theapplication based on the set of constraints using the set ofinter-connected meta models, wherein each of the set of instance modelscomprises an FHE library, the FHE functionality associated with the FHElibrary and the optimal configuration of the associated FHEfunctionality identified from the meta models based on the set ofconstraints. The system is further configured for optimizing each of theset of instance models based on the optimization task to obtain adecision for each of the set of constraints, wherein the optimizationtask is identified from a set of optimization tasks based on the userrequirement, the set of optimization tasks comprises one of a multiobjective-multi constraint optimization task and a single objective-multi constraint optimization task. The system is further configured foridentifying a pre-defined number of optimal instance models from the setof instance models using a ranking technique, wherein the rankingtechnique is performed based the set of constraints. The system isfurther configured for displaying an optimal instance model, wherein theoptimal instance model is indicative of the privacy preservation usingFHE to be enabled in the application.

In yet another aspect, a non-transitory computer readable medium for afor enabling privacy in an application using fully homomorphicencryption is provided. The program includes receiving, via a one ormore hardware processors, the application, a set of input data to theapplication, a set of constraints and a user requirement, wherein theset of input data are indicative of one or more functions performed bythe application, the set of constraints are indicative of functionalperformance and cost of the application, and the user requirement isindicative of an optimization task to be performed as per a user'srequirement. The program further includes generating, via the one ormore hardware processors, a set of inter-connected meta models based onan abstract data type (ADT) technique, wherein the set ofinter-connected meta models comprises a plurality of meta model trees,wherein each of the plurality of meta model trees comprises a pluralityof nodes that indicate a fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) library, aFHE functionality associated with the FHE library and an optimalconfiguration of the associated FHE functionality. The program furtherincludes generating, via the one or more hardware processors, a set ofinstance models for the application based on the set of constraintsusing the set of inter-connected meta models, wherein each of the set ofinstance models comprises an FHE library, the FHE functionalityassociated with the FHE library and the optimal configuration of theassociated FHE functionality identified from the meta models based onthe set of constraints. The program further includes optimizing, via theone or more hardware processors, each of the set of instance modelsbased on the optimization task to obtain a decision for each of the setof constraints, wherein the optimization task is identified from a setof optimization tasks based on the user requirement, the set ofoptimization tasks comprises one of a multi objective-multi constraintoptimization task and a single objective-multi constraint optimizationtask. The program further includes identifying, via the one or morehardware processors, a pre-defined number of optimal instance modelsfrom the set of instance models using a ranking technique, wherein theranking technique is performed based the set of constraints. The programfurther includes displaying, via the one or more hardware processors, anoptimal instance model, wherein the optimal instance model is indicativeof the privacy preservation using FHE to be enabled in the application.

It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description andthe following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory onlyand are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute apart of this disclosure, illustrate exemplary embodiments and, togetherwith the description, serve to explain the disclosed principles:

FIG. 1 illustrates a functional block diagram of an exemplary system forenabling privacy in an application using fully homomorphic encryption(FHE) according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram for the system of FIG. 1 accordingto some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 3A and FIG. 3B illustrates a use case example block diagram whereinFHE can be applied to machine learning applications in two scenariosthat include computation as a service and prediction as a servicerespectively, according to some embodiments of the present disclosure

FIG. 4A and FIG. 4B illustrates a use case of the set of input data tothe system for enabling privacy in an application using fullyhomomorphic encryption (FHE), according to some embodiments of thepresent disclosure.

FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B and FIG. 5C illustrates a use case of a set of metamodels with plurality of nodes, according to some embodiments of thepresent disclosure

FIG. 6A and FIG. 6B illustrates a use case of a set of instance modelswith plurality of nodes generated using the set of input data and theset of meta models, according to some embodiments of the presentdisclosure

FIG. 7 illustrates a use case of an optimal instance model withplurality of nodes generated using the set of instance models, accordingto some embodiments of the present disclosure

FIG. 8A and FIG. 8B is a flow diagram illustrating a method for enablingprivacy in an application using fully homomorphic encryption, inaccordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Exemplary embodiments are described with reference to the accompanyingdrawings. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference numberidentifies the figure in which the reference number first appears.Wherever convenient, the same reference numbers are used throughout thedrawings to refer to the same or like parts. While examples and featuresof disclosed principles are described herein, modifications,adaptations, and other implementations are possible without departingfrom the scope of the disclosed embodiments. It is intended that thefollowing detailed description be considered as exemplary only, with thetrue scope being indicated by the following claims.

COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

The embodiment discloses a method and a system for enabling privacy inan application using fully homomorphic encryption (FHE). The disclosuremore specifically refers to enabling a most optimal FHE for enablingprivacy preserving for an application based on a set of constraintsusing a disclosed set of optimization tasks. The set of optimizationtasks comprise a multi objective-multi constraint optimization task anda single objective-multi constraint optimization task, that identifiesan optimal FHE library, along with an associated FHE functionality andoptimal configuration of the associated FHE functionality based on theset of constraints. The identified FHE along with the associated FHEfunctionality and the optimal configuration of the associated FHEfunctionality facilitate optimal FHE implementation in applications.

The expression “application” in the context of the present disclosurerefers to a software/Information technology (IT) application for whichprivacy preservation is to be enabled. In an embodiment, the applicationor the software application can refer to a machine learning application,wherein privacy preservation is to be enabled in for ML datasets or MLalgorithms of the machine learning application. In another embodiment,the application or the software application include private informationretrieval and authentication systems. A computing device may includehardware and software collectively configured to host the IT applicationfor performing various functions.

The terms FHE and FHE library have been used interchangeably in thedescription, wherein Fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) or FHE libraryenables arbitrary computations on encrypted data from an applicationwithout decrypting them. Given a set of ciphertexts corresponding to aset of messages, a function can be computed resulting in an encryptedoutput, which when decrypted is equal to the result of computation. Atypical public key encryption algorithm has several functions thatperform generation of public and private key pairs, encrypting a messagewith public key and decrypt a message with private key respectively. Inaddition to these functions, FHE encryption algorithms have anadditional evaluation function that evaluates a given function over aset of input ciphertexts. The operations supported by FHE encryptionschemes depend on the underlying mathematical structure of theciphertexts.

Applications based on fully homomorphic encryption use either bit-wiseencryption instantiation or integer-wise encryption instantiation toencrypt data, however bit-wise encryption increases the size of datasets. The space required to store the ciphertext of a I-bit integer inbit-wise encryption instantiation is I-ciphertext units whereasinteger-wise encryption requires only one ciphertext unit client thanbit-wise encryption. Hence the challenge is to bring a balance betweenspace and performance.

FHE can be applied to machine learning applications in two scenarios:computation as a service and prediction as a service. In computation asa service model, a client requires to outsource ML computations to acloud service providers (CSP) without revealing any information aboutthe data to it. Here, the client is aware of the ML algorithm that isbeing outsourced and sends the algorithm and encrypted data to the CSP.The CSP performs the computations on the ciphertexts and sends theencrypted result back to the client. In prediction as a servicescenario, the service provider has proprietary machine learningalgorithms that they do not wish to share with the client. In the sameway, the client doesn't wish to share confidential data to the serviceprovider. Hence, using FHE, the client can provide encrypted inputs tothe cloud service provider, who then feeds these encrypted inputs to theproprietary ML algorithm and develop model parameters. The CSP can thenuse this encrypted model to provide prediction as a service to theclient. This way objectives of both client and server are realized. TheFIG. 3A and FIG. 3B illustrates a use case block diagram of the twoscenarios (FHE can be applied to machine learning applications in twoscenarios) computation as a service and prediction as a service,respectively.

Prominent open source implementations of FHE libraries include HElib,SEAL, HEAAN, PALISADE, TFHE and nGraph-HE. Each FHE library has multiplefunctionality, wherein the FHE functionality comprises a FHE scheme, anoptimal configuration for a set of supporting features for the FHElibrary, a set of FHE parameters and an optimal configuration of the setof FHE parameters, wherein the set of supporting features comprises apacking technique and a noise management technique. The set ofsupporting features refer to limitation of the FHE library, that must beoptimally configured for efficient privacy preserving in theapplication.

FHE library primarily rely on hardness of three types of hardnessassumptions:

-   -   Lattice: Lattice schemes rely on hardness of lattice problems        like Shortest Vector Problem (SVP) and Closest Vector Problem        (CVP).    -   LWE: LWE schemes rely on hardness of Learning with Errors        problem. The problem with these schemes is that the key sizes        are much larger.    -   RLWE: RLWE schemes rely on hardness of Ring LWE problem which is        efficient due to the underlying ring structure.        Ring based Learning with Errors (RLWE) is the basis for most of        the efficient FHE schemes. In an embodiment, the FHE parameters        in RLWE based FHE schemes are shared below;        M—the cyclotomic polynomial        N—degree of cyclotomic polynomial N=Ø(M)        p—modulus for co-efficient in the plaintext        t=p^(r)−plaintext modulus        h—1−norm of the secret key (example: form of vector x is Σ_(i=1)        ^(n)|x_(i)| q=q₁*q₂::: q_(l) where l=1 . . . L and L is the        number of primes        q is the co-efficient modulus for ciphertext and q₁ to q_(l) are        small primes        α—the width of Gaussian distribution for sampling error        X—the error distribution

The set of supporting features comprises a packing technique and a noisemanagement technique. Noise management is a major limitation of FHE.Every ciphertext has inherent noise associated which increases withnumber of computations. There are two ways for noise management,Bootstrapping and Modulus Switching. Bootstrapping is used to reduce thenoise and get fresh ciphertext homomorphically at the expense ofcomputation time. Modulus Switching helps in reducing noise but tocertain extent only. Further considering noise management in ML, simpleML computations like Matrix multiplication or linear regression arelinear in nature since they require only multiplication and additionoperations, however, complex ML algorithms like logistic regression,neural networks require computing of exponents which are non-linear innature and are hence hard to be computed in FHE setting.

From PPML perspective, packing is required to improve the spaceefficiency and speed up the computation process of ML algorithms. Tomake the ML algorithms non-interactive, bootstrapping is required, whichis expensive. However, to make ML algorithms more efficient andnon-interactive, methodologies have to be designed to perform lightweight bootstrapping on the packed ciphertexts.

Hence to efficiently enable privacy for ML applications, it is extremlyimportant to choose an optimal FHE and also ensure that the chosen FHEis optimally configured (FHE parameters) for better performance alongwith minimizing the limitations that include noise management andpacking.

Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to FIG.1 throughFIG. 8B where similar reference characters denote corresponding featuresconsistently throughout the figures, there are shown preferredembodiments and these embodiments are described in the context of thefollowing exemplary system and/or method.

FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of a system 100 for enabling fullyhomomorphic encryption (FHE) based privacy in an application inaccordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure.

In an embodiment, the system 100 includes a processor(s) 104,communication interface device(s), alternatively referred asinput/output (I/O) interface(s) 106, and one or more data storagedevices or a memory 102 operatively coupled to the processor(s) 104. Thesystem 100 with one or more hardware processors is configured to executefunctions of one or more functional blocks of the system 100.

Referring to the components of system 100, in an embodiment, theprocessor(s) 104, can be one or more hardware processors 104. In anembodiment, the one or more hardware processors 104 can be implementedas one or more microprocessors, microcomputers, microcontrollers,digital signal processors, central processing units, state machines,logic circuitries, and/or any devices that manipulate signals based onoperational instructions. Among other capabilities, the one or morehardware processors 104 is configured to fetch and executecomputer-readable instructions stored in the memory 102. In anembodiment, the system 100 can be implemented in a variety of computingsystems including laptop computers, notebooks, hand-held devices such asmobile phones, workstations, mainframe computers, servers, a networkcloud and the like.

The I/O interface(s) 106 can include a variety of software and hardwareinterfaces, for example, a web interface, a graphical user interface, atouch user interface (TUI) and the like and can facilitate multiplecommunications within a wide variety of networks N/W and protocol types,including wired networks, for example, LAN, cable, etc., and wirelessnetworks, such as WLAN, cellular, or satellite. In an embodiment, theI/O interface (s) 106 can include one or more ports for connecting anumber of devices (nodes) of the system 100 to one another or to anotherserver.

The memory 102 may include any computer-readable medium known in the artincluding, for example, volatile memory, such as static random accessmemory (SRAM) and dynamic random access memory (DRAM), and/ornon-volatile memory, such as read only memory (ROM), erasableprogrammable ROM, flash memories, hard disks, optical disks, andmagnetic tapes.

Further, the memory 102 may include a database 108. Thus, the memory 102may comprise information pertaining to input(s)/output(s) of each stepperformed by the processor(s) 104 of the system 100 and methods of thepresent disclosure. In an embodiment, the database 108 may be external(not shown) to the system 100 and coupled to the system via the I/Ointerface 106. Functions of the components of system 100 are explainedin conjunction with functional overview of the system 100 in FIG. 1 andflow diagram of FIGS. 8A and 8B for enabling privacy in an applicationusing fully homomorphic encryption.

The system 100 supports various connectivity options such as BLUETOOTH®,USB, ZigBee and other cellular services. The network environment enablesconnection of various components of the system 100 using anycommunication link including Internet, WAN, MAN, and so on. In anexemplary embodiment, the system 100 is implemented to operate as astand-alone device. In another embodiment, the system 100 may beimplemented to work as a loosely coupled device to a smart computingenvironment. The components and functionalities of the system 100 aredescribed further in detail.

FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of the system 100 of FIG. 1, inaccordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. As depictedin the architecture, FIG.2 illustrates the functions of the componentsof the system 100 that includes enabling privacy in an application usingfully homomorphic encryption.

The system 100 for enabling privacy in an application using FHE includesan input module 202 configured for receiving, via a one or more hardwareprocessors, an application, a set of input data pertaining to theapplication, a set of constraints and a user requirement. The set ofinput data are indicative of functions performed by the application, theset of constraints are indicative of functional performance and cost ofthe application, and the user requirement is indicative of anoptimization task to be performed as per a user's requirement.

In an embodiment, the application can refer to a machine learningapplication, wherein privacy preservation is to be enabled in for MLdatasets or ML algorithms of the machine learning application.

In an embodiment, the set of constraints includes one of a user-definedconstraints and a pre-defined constraints. In an embodiment, the set ofconstraints comprises a computation time (τ_(f)), a memory consumption (

), a communication cost (comm_(f)), a computation cost (ξ_(f)) and asecurity level (λ) as shown below;

C={τ,m,comm,ξ}

In an embodiment, the set of input data are indicative of functionsperformed by the application that include matrix multiplication,logistic regression, linear regression, neural networks. A use case ofthe set of input data is illustrated in the FIG. 4A and FIG. 4B, whereineach node represents a leaf nodes represent the input ciphertexts andintermediate nodes represent a set of operations to be performed in acomputation.

In an embodiment, the user requirement is indicative of an optimizationtask to be performed as per a user's requirement. The set ofoptimization tasks includes one of a multi objective-multi constraintoptimization task and a single objective- multi constraint optimizationtask. Based on the user requirement, one optimization task from the setof optimization tasks is selected to be implemented for enablingprivacy.

According to an embodiment of the disclosure, the system 100 forenabling privacy in an application using FHE further comprises an metamodel generator 204 configured for generating, via the one or morehardware processors, a set of inter-connected meta models based on anabstract data type (ADT) technique. The set of meta models comprises aplurality of meta model trees, wherein each of the plurality of metamodel trees comprises a plurality of nodes that indicate a fullyhomomorphic encryption (FHE) library, an associated FHE functionalityand an optimal configuration of the associated FHE functionality.

In an embodiment, the abstract data type (ADT) technique comprises of acomputation tree technique, JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) parsing,wherein the computation tree technique comprises representation of theapplication as a set of functions with a plurality of inter-connectednodes forming a tree structure.

In an embodiment, fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) or FHE libraryenables arbitrary computations on encrypted data from an applicationwithout decrypting them. Given a set of ciphertexts corresponding to aset of messages, a function can be computed resulting in an encryptedoutput, which when decrypted is equal to the result of computation.

In an embodiment, the FHE functionality comprises a FHE scheme, a set ofsupporting features and a set of FHE parameters and the optimalconfiguration of the associated FHE functionality comprises of anoptimal configuration for the set of supporting features for the FHE andan optimal configuration for the set of FHE parameters.

In an embodiment, the FHE library includes a Homomorphic Encryptionlibrary (HElib), a Simple Encrypted Arithmetic Library (SEAL), aHomomorphic Encryption for Arithmetic of Approximate Numbers (HEAAN),PALISADE, Torus Fully Homomorphic Encryption (TFHE) and nGraph-HE.Further the FHE scheme includes brakerski, fan, vercauteren (BGV),Brakerski, Fan (BFE), Cheon, Kim, Kim, Song (CKKS)

In an embodiment, the set of supporting features comprises a packingtechnique and a noise management technique. Noise management is a majorlimitation of FHE. Every ciphertext has inherent noise associated whichincreases with number of computations. There are two ways for noisemanagement, bootstrapping and modulus switching. Bootstrapping is usedto reduce the noise and get fresh ciphertext homomorphically at theexpense of computation time. Modulus switching helps in reducing noisebut to certain extent only. Further considering noise management in ML,simple ML computations like matrix multiplication or linear regressionare linear in nature since they require only multiplication and additionoperations, however, complex ML algorithms such as logistic regression,neural networks require computing of exponents which are non-linear innature and are hence hard to be computed in FHE setting. Further thepacking is required in order to improve the space efficiency and speedup the computation process of ML algorithms. To make the ML algorithmsnon-interactive, bootstrapping is required, which is expensive. However,to make ML algorithms more efficient and non-interactive, methodologieshave to be designed to perform light weight bootstrapping on the packedciphertexts.

The set of FHE parameters are selected from an exhaustive set of FHEscheme parameters associated with the FHE library and the FHE schema,wherein the exhaustive set of FHE scheme parameters comprise acyclotomic polynomial (M), a degree of cyclotomic polynomial (N), amodulus for coefficients in plaintext (p), a plaintext modulus (t), anorm of secret key (h), a width of Gaussian distribution for samplingerror (a) and an error distribution (X), which can be expressed as shownbelow:

-   -   M—the cyclotomic polynomial    -   N—degree of cyclotomic polynomial N=Ø(M)    -   p—modulus for co-efficient in the plaintext    -   t=p^(r)−plaintext modulus    -   h—1−norm of the secret key (example:    -   form of vector x is Σ_(i=1) ^(n)|x_(i)|    -   q=q₁*q₂:::q_(l)=1 . . . L and L is the number of primes    -   q is the co-efficient modulus for ciphertext and q₁ to q_(l) are        small primes    -   a—the width of Gaussian distribution for sampling error    -   X—the error distribution

The set of FHE parameters and the optimal configuration for the set ofFHE parameters is selected from the exhaustive set of FHE schemeparameters based on a circuit depth, a level of accuracy and the set ofsupporting features wherein the circuit depth and the level of accuracyis determined based on a multiplication operation between a set of nodesin the meta model trees of the meta-models.

In an embodiment, the FIG. 4A and FIG. 4B the circular depth can beexpressed as shown below:

f1=a+b*c

f2=a*b*c

Hence the circular depth for f1 would be 1 and the circular depth for f2would be 2.Further for the level of accuracy, multiplication operation forfunctions such as Sigmoid depend on approximation polynomials as givenin Table 1, wherein higher degree polynomials give more accuracy.

TABLE 1 Approximation Polynomials for Sigmoid Approximation PolynomialMethod 1 0.5 + 0.25x − 0.0208x³ + 0.00208x³ Taylor series 2 0.5 + 0.15x− 0.0015x³ Least square approximation

Hence the set of inter-connected of meta models that is generated basedon ADT techniques comprises a plurality of meta model trees, whereineach of the plurality of meta model trees comprises a plurality of nodesthat indicate a fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) library, anassociated FHE functionality and an optimal configuration of theassociated FHE functionality. Considering the plurality of nodesinvolved are extremly complex and complicated as they are based onseveral features as explained above. In an embodiment, the meta modelswith plurality of nodes is illustrated in FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B and FIG. 5Cwherein each node has a pair [a time, a memory] associated with it,wherein the time is represented as milliseconds and the memoryrepresented as in kilobytes (KB). The memory represents a size ofciphertext after encryption (for a leaf node) and a resultant ciphertextafter computation (for a intermediate node. Further for each of a leafnode, the time indicates an encryption time and for each of theintermediate nodes the time indicates the computation time. The tablebelow summarizes the computation time and memory per ciphertext requiredfor a given computation using SEAL library (BFV and CKKS) and HEAANlibrary (CKKS).

TABLE 2 Tabulating constraints for a given computation Without PackingSEAL HEAAN SEAL Operation (BFV) (CKKS) (CKKS) Addition (ms) 0.019 0.260.06 Multiplication (ms) 1 3.36 0.17 a + b*c (ms) 1.619 7.2 0.83 Memoryper 2 26 4 ciphertext (KB)

According to an embodiment of the disclosure, the system 100 forenabling privacy in an application using FHE further comprises aninstance model generator 206 configured for generating, via the one ormore hardware processors, a set of instance models for the applicationbased on the set of constraints using the set of inter-connected metamodels. Each of the set of instance models comprises a fully homomorphicencryption (FHE) technique, the associated FHE functionality and theoptimal configuration of the associated FHE functionality identifiedfrom the meta models based on the set of constraints.

The set of instance models for the application based on the set ofconstraints uses the set of inter-connected meta models. In anembodiment, considering a use case example wherein the set ofconstraints can be defined as follow:

Constraint 1=time<2 ms

Constraint 2=memory<10 KB

Based on the given constraints and the meta models (as shared in FIG.4A, FIG. 4B and FIG. 4C), the set of instance models with plurality ofnodes generated based on the set of constraints is illustrated in FIG.6A and FIG. 6B wherein based on the time and memory constraints defined,the metamodels of FIG. 4A and FIG. 4C only are used for generating theinstance models.

According to an embodiment of the disclosure, the system 100 forenabling privacy in an application using FHE further comprises anoptimizer 208 configured for optimizing, via the one or more hardwareprocessors, each of the set of instance models by an optimization taskto obtain a decision for each of the set of constraints. Theoptimization task is identified from a set of optimization tasks basedon the user requirement and the set of optimization tasks comprises amulti objective-multi constraint optimization task and a singleobjective-multi constraint optimization task.

In an embodiment, the user requirement is indicative of an optimizationtask to be performed as per a user's requirement. The set ofoptimization tasks comprise the multi objective-multi constraintoptimization task and the single objective-multi constraint optimizationtask, wherein one optimization task is identified from the set ofoptimization tasks to be implemented for enabling privacy preservationbased on the user requirement.

In an embodiment, the multi objective-multi constraint optimization taskoptimizes the set of constraints that include minimize computation timeτ, memory consumption m, communication cost comm and computation cost ofa function F in a privacy preserving manner and is represented asfollows:

ℱ_(c_(†))^(*) = argmin  {ℱ_(j)^(c_(†))|ℱ_(j)^(c_(†)) = argmin  {{F_(jk)^(c_(†))|λ_(j) > λ}_(kɛS_(l_(j))), l_(j)ɛℒ}  wherec_(†) ∈ C

such that

${\mathcal{F}_{jk}^{c_{\dagger}} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{|\mathcal{F}|}{\mathcal{F}_{ijk}^{c_{\dagger}}x_{ijk}}} \leq c_{\dagger\; f}}},{{\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{|\mathcal{F}|}x_{ijk}} = |\mathcal{F}|}$

where,set of constraints is represented by C={τ, m, comm, ξ}, τ_(f) is thecomputation time,

is the memory consumption, comm_(f) is the communication cost, ξ_(f) isthe computation cost and λ is the security level,

is optimal instance model,F={f₁, f₂, f₃, . . . f_(n)}: Set of sub-computations,F_(jk): Instance model generated using j^(th) FHE library and FHE schemeF*_(jk): Instance model generated using j^(th) FHE library and FHEscheme

: Optimal instance model based on constraint c_(†)∈C

: Optimal constraint for instance model F model using FHE library l_(f),where c_(†)∈Cp_(q): Number of schemes supported by library Iλ_(j): Security level for FHE library jα: Number of FHE libraries

={l₁ . . . l_(α)}: set of FHE libraries available|

|: Number of sub-functionsf_(i)∈F: i^(th) sub computations of F

: Constraint to compute f_(i) using library l_(j) and FHE scheme S_(l)_(jk) , where c_(†)∈CW_(c) _(†) : User given priority for constraint computation time wheretime τ where c_(†)∈C

$x_{ijk} = \left\{ \begin{matrix}1 & {{If}\mspace{14mu} f_{i}\mspace{14mu}{can}\mspace{14mu}{be}\mspace{14mu}{computed}\mspace{14mu}{using}\mspace{14mu}{library}\mspace{14mu} l_{j}\mspace{14mu}{and}\mspace{14mu}{FHE}\mspace{14mu}{scheme}\mspace{14mu} S_{l_{jk}}} \\0 & {otherwise}\end{matrix} \right.$

In an embodiment, the single objective-multi constraint optimizationtask comprises:

${\mathcal{F}^{*} = {{argmin}\mspace{11mu}\left\{ {\left. F_{j} \middle| F_{j} \right. = {{argmin}\mspace{11mu}\left\{ F_{jk} \middle| {\lambda_{j} > \lambda} \right\}_{kɛS_{l_{j}}}l_{j}{ɛ\mathcal{L}}}} \right\}}},{F_{jk} = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{|\mathcal{F}|}{\mathcal{F}_{ijk}^{c_{\dagger}}x_{ijk}}}}$

such that

F _(jk) =

_(τ) *f _(ijk) ^(τ) +

_(m) *f _(ijk) ^(m)+

_(comm) *f _(ijk) ^(comm)+

_(ξ) *f _(ijk) ^(ξ),

where

_(τ)+

_(m)+

_(comm)+

_(ξ)=1 and

≤c _(†) _(f)

x _(ijk)=|

|

whereset of constraints is represented by C={τ, m, comm, ξ}, τ_(f) is thecomputation time,

is the memory consumption, comm_(f) is the communication cost, ξ_(f) isthe computation cost and λ is the security level,

is optimal instance model,F={f₁, f₂, f₃, . . . f_(n)}: Set of sub-computations,F_(jk): Instance model generated using j^(th) FHE library and FHE schemeF*_(jk): Instance model generated using j^(th) FHE library and FHEscheme

: Optimal instance model based on constraint c_(†)∈C

: Optimal constraint for instance model F model using FHE library l_(j),where c_(†)∈Cp_(q): Number od schemes supported by library Iλ_(j): Security level for FHE library jα: Number of FHE libraries

={l₁ . . . l_(α)}: set of FHE libraries available|

|: Number of sub-functionsf_(i)∈F: i^(th) sub computations of F

: Constraint to compute f_(i) using library l_(j) band FHE scheme S_(l)_(jk) , where c_(†)∈CW_(c) _(†) : User given priority for constraint computation time wheretime τ where c_(†)∈C

$x_{ijk} = \left\{ \begin{matrix}1 & {{If}\mspace{14mu} f_{i}\mspace{14mu}{can}\mspace{14mu}{be}\mspace{14mu}{computed}\mspace{14mu}{using}\mspace{14mu}{library}\mspace{14mu} l_{j}\mspace{14mu}{and}\mspace{14mu}{FHE}\mspace{14mu}{scheme}\mspace{14mu} S_{l_{jk}}} \\0 & {otherwise}\end{matrix} \right.$

According to an embodiment of the disclosure, the system 100 forenabling privacy in an application using FHE further comprises anoptimal instance model identifier 210 configured for identifying, viathe one or more hardware processors, a pre-defined number of optimalinstance models from the set of instance models using a rankingtechnique. The ranking technique is performed based on the set ofconstraints.

In an embodiment, the ranking techniques includes, but are not limitedto, weighted sum model, aggregated indices randomization and Techniquefor Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). In anembodiment, the ranking technique is performed based on set ofconstraints, wherein the user can prioritize among the set ofconstraints and the ranking process for the set of instance models isperformed accordingly.

In an embodiment, the pre-defined number of optimal instance models isdecided based on a user's requirement, wherein the user can choose howmany optimal instance models the user may want to be displayed for afinal selection of the privacy preserving technique to be used. In a usecase scenario, if the user wishes to see top 3 optimal instance models,then the top three optimal instance models from the ranked list isdisplayed for the user.

In an embodiment, the pre-defined number of optimal instance modelsidentified from the set of instance models is illustrated in FIG.7wherein an optimal instance model is selected from the instance models(of FIG. 6A and FIG. 6B) based on the set of constraints and the user'srequirement.

According to an embodiment of the disclosure, the system 100 forenabling privacy in an application using FHE further comprises an outputmodule 212 configured for displaying, via the one or more hardwareprocessors, the optimal instance model. The optimal instance model isindicative of the privacy preservation using FHE to be enabled in theapplication based on the fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) library, theassociated FHE functionality and the optimal configuration of theassociated FHE functionality in the optimal instance model

The various modules of the system 100 for enabling privacy in anapplication using fully homomorphic encryption are implemented as atleast one of a logically self-contained part of a software program, aself-contained hardware component, and/or, a self-contained hardwarecomponent with a logically self-contained part of a software programembedded into each of the hardware component that when executed performthe above method described herein.

Functions of the components of the system 100 are explained inconjunction with functional modules of the system 100 stored in thememory 102 and further explained in conjunction with flow diagram ofFIGS. 8A and 8B. The FIG. 8A and FIG. 8B, with reference to FIG. 1, isan exemplary flow diagram illustrating a method (800) for using thesystem 100 of FIG. 1 according to an embodiment of the presentdisclosure.

The steps of the method of the present disclosure will now be explainedwith reference to the components of the system (100) for enabling fullyhomomorphic encryption (FHE) based privacy preservation in anapplication and the modules (202-212) as depicted in FIG.2 and the flowdiagrams as depicted in FIG. 8A and FIG. 8B. Although process steps,method steps, techniques or the like may be described in a sequentialorder, such processes, methods and techniques may be configured to workin alternate orders. In other words, any sequence or order of steps thatmay be described does not necessarily indicate a requirement that thesteps to be performed in that order. The steps of processes describedherein may be performed in any order practical. Further, some steps maybe performed simultaneously.

At step 802 of the method (800), the one or more hardware processors areconfigured receiving, in the input module 202, an application, a set ofinput data to the application, a set of constraints and a userrequirement, wherein the set of input data are indicative of functionsperformed by the application, the set of constraints are indicative offunctional performance and cost of the application, and the userrequirement is indicative of an optimization task to be performed as pera user's requirement.

In an embodiment, the application can refer to a machine learningapplication, wherein privacy preservation is to be enabled in for MLdatasets or ML algorithms of the machine learning application.

In an embodiment, the set of constraints comprises of either auser-defined constraint or a pre-defined constraint. The set ofconstraints comprises a a computation time (τ_(f)), a memory consumption(

), a communication cost (comm_(f)), a computation cost (ξ_(f)) and asecurity level (λ).

In an embodiment, the set of input data are indicative of functionsperformed by the application that includes matrix multiplication,logistic regression, linear regression, neural networks.

In an embodiment, the user requirement is indicative of an optimizationtask to be performed as per a user's requirement. The set ofoptimization tasks comprise a multi objective-multi constraintoptimization task and a single objective- multi constraint optimizationtask. Based on the user requirement one optimization task from the setof optimization tasks is selected to be implemented for enabling privacypreservation.

At step 804 of the method (800), the one or more hardware processors areconfigured for generating a set of inter-connected meta models based onan abstract data type (ADT) technique in the meta model generator 204.The set of meta models comprises a plurality of meta model trees,wherein each of the plurality of meta model trees comprises a pluralityof nodes that indicate a fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) library, anassociated FHE functionality and an optimal configuration of theassociated FHE functionality.

In an embodiment, in an embodiment, the abstract data type (ADT)technique comprises of a computation tree technique, JSON parsing,wherein the computation tree technique comprises representation of theapplication as a set of functions with a plurality of inter-connectednodes forming a tree structure

At step 806 of the method (800), the one or more hardware processors areconfigured for generating a set of instance models for the applicationbased on the set of constraints using the set of inter-connected metamodels in the instance model generator 206. Each of the set of instancemodels comprises a fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) library, theassociated FHE functionality and the optimal configuration of theassociated FHE functionality identified from the meta models based onthe set of constraints.

At step 808 of the method (800), the one or more hardware processors areconfigured for optimizing each of the set of instance models by anoptimization task to obtain a decision for each of the set ofconstraints in the optimizer 208. The optimization task is identifiedfrom a set of optimization tasks based on the user requirement and theset of optimization tasks comprises a multi objective-multi constraintoptimization task and a single objective-multi constraint optimizationtask.

In an embodiment, the user requirement is indicative of an optimizationtask to be performed as per a user's requirement. The set ofoptimization tasks comprise the multi objective-multi constraintoptimization task and the single objective-multi constraint optimizationtask, wherein one optimization task is identified from the set ofoptimization tasks to be implemented for enabling privacy preservationbased on the user requirement.

In an embodiment, the multi objective-multi constraint optimization taskoptimizes the set of constraints that include minimize computation timeτ, memory consumption m, communication cost comm and computation cost ofa function F in a privacy preserving manner and is represented asfollows:

ℱ_(c_(†))^(*) = argmin  {ℱ_(j)^(c_(†))|ℱ_(j)^(c_(†)) = argmin  {{ℱ_(jk)^(c_(†))|λ_(j) > λ}_(kɛS_(l_(j))), l_(j)ɛℒ}  wherec_(†) ∈ C

such that

${\mathcal{F}_{jk}^{c_{\dagger}} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{|\mathcal{F}|}{\mathcal{F}_{ijk}^{c_{\dagger}}x_{ijk}}} \leq c_{\dagger\; f}}},{{\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{|\mathcal{F}|}x_{ijk}} = {\mathcal{F}}}$

where,set of constraints is represented by C={τ,m,comm, ξ},τ_(f) is the computation time,

is the memory consumption, comm_(f) is the communication cost, ξ_(f) sthe computation cost and λ is the security level,

is optimal instance model,F={f₁, f₂, f₃, . . . f_(n)}: Set of sub-computations,F_(jk): Instance model generated using j^(th) FHE library and FHE schemeF*_(jk): Instance model generated using j^(th) FHE library and FHEscheme

: Optimal instance model based on constraint c_(†)∈C

: Optimal constraint for instance model F model using FHE library l_(j),where c_(†)∈Cp_(q): Number od schemes supported by library Iλ_(j): Security level for FHE library jα: Number of FHE libraries

={l₁ . . . l_(α)}: set of FHE libraries available|

51 : Number of sub-functionsf_(i)∈F: i^(th) sub computations of F

: Constraint to compute f_(i) using library l_(j) and FHE scheme S_(l)_(jk) , where c_(†)∈CW_(c) _(†) : User given priority for constraint computation time wheretime τ where c_(†)∈C

$x_{ijk} = \left\{ \begin{matrix}1 & {{If}\mspace{14mu} f_{i}\mspace{14mu}{can}\mspace{14mu}{be}\mspace{14mu}{computed}\mspace{14mu}{using}\mspace{14mu}{library}\mspace{14mu} l_{j}\mspace{14mu}{and}\mspace{14mu}{FHE}\mspace{14mu}{scheme}\mspace{14mu} S_{l_{jk}}} \\0 & {otherwise}\end{matrix} \right.$

In an embodiment, the single objective-multi constraint optimizationtask comprises:

${\mathcal{F}^{*} = {{argmin}\mspace{14mu}\left\{ {\left. F_{j} \middle| F_{j} \right. = {{argmin}\mspace{11mu}\left\{ F_{jk} \middle| {\lambda_{j} > \lambda} \right\}_{kɛS_{l_{j}}}l_{j}{ɛ\mathcal{L}}}} \right\}}},{F_{jk} = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{|\mathcal{F}|}{\mathcal{F}_{ijk}^{c_{\dagger}}x_{ijk}}}}$

such that

F _(jk) =

_(τ) *f _(ijk) ^(τ)+

_(m) *f _(ijk) ^(m)+

_(comm) *f _(ijk) ^(comm)+

_(ξ) *f _(ijk) ^(ξ),

where

x _(ijk) ≤c _(†f),

x _(ijk)=|

|

whereset of constraints is represented by C={τ,m,comm,ξ},τ_(f) is the computation time,

is the memory consumption, comm_(f) is the communication cost, ξ_(f) isthe computation cost and λ is the security level,

is optimal instance model,F={f₁, f₂, f₃, . . . f_(n)}: Set of sub-computations,F_(jk): Instance model generated using j^(th) FHE library and FHE schemeF*_(jk): Instance model generated using j^(th) FHE library and FHEscheme

: Optimal instance model based on constraint c_(†)∈C

: Optimal constraint for instance model F model using FHE library l_(j),where c_(†)∈Cp_(q): Number od schemes supported by library Iλ_(j): Security level for FHE library jα: Number of FHE libraries

={;₁ . . . l_(α)}: set of FHE libraries available|

|: Number of sub-functionsf_(i)∈F: i^(th) sub computations of F

: Constraint to compute f_(l) using library l_(j) and FHE scheme S_(l)_(jk) , where c_(†)∈CW_(c) _(†) : User given priority for constraint computation time wheretime τ where c_(†)∈C

$x_{ijk} = \left\{ \begin{matrix}1 & {{If}\mspace{14mu} f_{i}\mspace{14mu}{can}\mspace{14mu}{be}\mspace{14mu}{computed}\mspace{14mu}{using}\mspace{14mu}{library}\mspace{14mu} l_{j}\mspace{14mu}{and}\mspace{14mu}{FHE}\mspace{14mu}{scheme}\mspace{14mu} S_{l_{jk}}} \\0 & {otherwise}\end{matrix} \right.$

At step 810 of the method (800), the one or more hardware processors areconfigured for identifying a pre-defined number of optimal instancemodels from the set of instance models using a ranking technique in theoptimal instance model identifier 210. The ranking technique isperformed based on the decision for each of the set of constraints

In an embodiment, the ranking techniques includes weighted sum model andaggregated indices randomization. The ranking technique is performedbased on set of constraints, wherein the user can prioritize among theset of constraints and the ranking process for the set of instancemodels is performed accordingly.

At step 812 of the method (800), the one or more hardware processors areconfigured for displaying the optimal instance model in the comprises anoutput module 212. The optimal instance model is indicative of theprivacy preservation using FHE to be enabled in the application based onthe fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) library, the associated FHEfunctionality and the optimal configuration of the associated FHEfunctionality in the optimal instance model

The written description describes the subject matter herein to enableany person skilled in the art to make and use the embodiments. The scopeof the subject matter embodiments is defined by the claims and mayinclude other modifications that occur to those skilled in the art. Suchother modifications are intended to be within the scope of the claims ifthey have similar elements that do not differ from the literal languageof the claims or if they include equivalent elements with insubstantialdifferences from the literal language of the claims.

Experimental Results:

The experiment has been conducted using the single objective-multiconstraint optimization task optimization problem using a TOPSISoptimizer. Two sets of inputs are given to optimization solver (TOPSIS),set-I is Columns (2, 3 & 4) and set-II is Columns (5 to 10). Set-I giveestimates of each of the operations based on the computation of basicprimitive operations. Using this the optimizer gave SEAL library as theoptimal solution for matrix multiplication. For set-II, if time andmemory consumption are given same weightage by the user, the optimizergives SEAL-2 as the optimal solution, with HEAAN 2 as the secondpreference and SEAL as third. However, if memory is given higherweightage, then optimizer returns HEAAN-2 as the optimal solution,SEAL-2 and SEAL as second and third preference respectively. The samehas been documented in the table 4 below;

TABLE 4 Experiment using TOPSIS 1 Calculated estimates Practical w/opacking Practical with packing Operation HElib SEAL HEAAN HElib SEALHEAAN SEAL2 HEAAN2 Add + Mul (millisecs) 16 13.5 28.

16 13.5 28.

30 283 100 × 100 Matrix mult on 32 cores (secs) 330 200 1100 680 278 74511.7 22.5 Memory per ciphertext (KB) 443 16 106 443 16 106 262144 1048Memory for 100 × 100 matrix mult(GB) 4.4 0.16 1.06 11.4* 3.78* 17.78*0.8* 0.14* Rank-Time and Mem equal weight 2 1 3 4 3 5 1 2 Rank-Mem moreweight than Time 3 1 2 4 3 5 2 1

indicates data missing or illegible when filed

Further the experimentation was conducted with two more sets of inputsto the recommendation system optimization solver (TOPSIS), set-I Columns(2&3g) and set-II Columns (4&5). The optimizer gives HEAAN as the bestsolution for both the sets as shown below in table 5 below:

TABLE 5 Experiment using TOPSIS 2 Calculated estimates PracticalOperation SEAL HEAAN SEAL HEAAN Add (millisecs) 2 0.88  2    0.88 Mul(millisecs) 62.8 470   62.8 470 Time—Linear 2 1.8 10    7.7Regression—150 × 4 dataset (secs) Memory per ciphertext 64 524 64 524(KB) Memory for LR(MB) 151 0.01  921 *      0.469 * Rank 2 1  2  1

The embodiments of present disclosure herein address the problem ofenabling privacy in an application using fully homomorphic encryption.The disclosure more specifically refers to enabling a most optimal FHEfor enabling privacy for an application based on a set of constraintsusing a disclosed set of optimization tasks. The set of optimizationtasks comprise a multi objective-multi constraint optimization task anda single objective-multi constraint optimization task, that identifiesan optimal FHE library, along with an associated FHE functionality andoptimal configuration of the associated FHE functionality based on theset of constraints. The identified FHE along with the associated FHEfunctionality and the optimal configuration of the associated FHEfunctionality facilitate optimal implementation of privacy inapplications.

It is to be understood that the scope of the protection is extended tosuch a program and in addition to a computer-readable means having amessage therein; such computer-readable storage means containprogram-code means for implementation of one or more steps of themethod, when the program runs on a server or mobile device or anysuitable programmable device. The hardware device can be any kind ofdevice which can be programmed including e.g. any kind of computer likea server or a personal computer, or the like, or any combinationthereof. The device may also include means which could be e.g. hardwaremeans like e.g. an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), afield-programmable gate array (FPGA), or a combination of hardware andsoftware means, e.g. an ASIC and an FPGA, or at least one microprocessorand at least one memory with software processing components locatedtherein. Thus, the means can include both hardware means and softwaremeans. The method embodiments described herein could be implemented inhardware and software. The device may also include software means.Alternatively, the embodiments may be implemented on different hardwaredevices, e.g. using a plurality of CPUs.

The embodiments herein can comprise hardware and software elements. Theembodiments that are implemented in software include but are not limitedto, firmware, resident software, microcode, etc. The functions performedby various components described herein may be implemented in othercomponents or combinations of other components. For the purposes of thisdescription, a computer-usable or computer readable medium can be anyapparatus that can comprise, store, communicate, propagate, or transportthe program for use by or in connection with the instruction executionsystem, apparatus, or device.

The illustrated steps are set out to explain the exemplary embodimentsshown, and it should be anticipated that ongoing technologicaldevelopment will change the manner in which particular functions areperformed. These examples are presented herein for purposes ofillustration, and not limitation. Further, the boundaries of thefunctional building blocks have been arbitrarily defined herein for theconvenience of the description. Alternative boundaries can be defined solong as the specified functions and relationships thereof areappropriately performed. Alternatives (including equivalents,extensions, variations, deviations, etc., of those described herein)will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art(s) based on theteachings contained herein. Such alternatives fall within the scope ofthe disclosed embodiments. Also, the words “comprising,” “having,”“containing,” and “including,” and other similar forms are intended tobe equivalent in meaning and be open ended in that an item or itemsfollowing any one of these words is not meant to be an exhaustivelisting of such item or items, or meant to be limited to only the listeditem or items. It must also be noted that as used herein and in theappended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include pluralreferences unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.

Furthermore, one or more computer-readable storage media may be utilizedin implementing embodiments consistent with the present disclosure. Acomputer-readable storage medium refers to any type of physical memoryon which information or data readable by a processor may be stored.Thus, a computer-readable storage medium may store instructions forexecution by one or more processors, including instructions for causingthe processor(s) to perform steps or stages consistent with theembodiments described herein. The term “computer-readable medium” shouldbe understood to include tangible items and exclude carrier waves andtransient signals, i.e., be non-transitory. Examples include randomaccess memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), volatile memory,nonvolatile memory, hard drives, CD ROMs, DVDs, flash drives, disks, andany other known physical storage media.

It is intended that the disclosure and examples be considered asexemplary only, with a true scope of disclosed embodiments beingindicated by the following claims

What is claimed is:
 1. A processor-implemented method for enablingprivacy in an application using fully homomorphic encryption (FHE), themethod comprising: receiving, via a one or more hardware processors, theapplication, a set of input data to the application, a set ofconstraints and a user requirement, wherein the set of input data areindicative of one or more functions performed by the application, theset of constraints are indicative of functional performance and cost ofthe application, and the user requirement is indicative of anoptimization task to be performed as per a user's requirement;generating, via the one or more hardware processors, a set ofinter-connected meta models based on an abstract data type (ADT)technique, wherein the set of inter-connected meta models comprises aplurality of meta model trees, wherein each of the plurality of metamodel trees comprises a plurality of nodes that indicate a fullyhomomorphic encryption (FHE) library, a FHE functionality associatedwith the FHE library and an optimal configuration of the associated FHEfunctionality; generating, via the one or more hardware processors, aset of instance models for the application based on the set ofconstraints using the set of inter-connected meta models, wherein eachof the set of instance models comprises an FHE library, the FHEfunctionality associated with the FHE library and the optimalconfiguration of the associated FHE functionality identified from themeta models based on the set of constraints; optimizing, via the one ormore hardware processors, each of the set of instance models based onthe optimization task to obtain a decision for each of the set ofconstraints, wherein the optimization task is identified from a set ofoptimization tasks based on the user requirement, the set ofoptimization tasks comprises one of a multi objective-multi constraintoptimization task and a single objective-multi constraint optimizationtask; identifying, via the one or more hardware processors, apre-defined number of optimal instance models from the set of instancemodels using a ranking technique, wherein the ranking technique isperformed based the set of constraints; and displaying, via the one ormore hardware processors, an optimal instance model, wherein the optimalinstance model is indicative of the privacy preservation using FHE to beenabled in the application.
 2. The method according to claim 1, whereinthe set of constraints comprises one of a user-defined constraints or apre-defined constraints, where the set of constraints comprises acomputation type, a computation time, a memory consumption, acommunication cost, a computation cost and a security level.
 3. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the ADT technique comprises of a computationtree technique, JavaScript Object Notation (JSON™) parsing, wherein thecomputation tree technique comprises representation of the applicationas a set of functions with a plurality of inter-connected nodes forminga tree structure.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the FHEfunctionality comprises a FHE scheme, a set of supporting features and aset of FHE parameters and the optimal configuration of the associatedFHE functionality comprises of an optimal configuration for the set ofsupporting features for the FHE and an optimal configuration for the setof FHE parameters.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the set ofsupporting features comprises a packing technique and a noise managementtechnique.
 6. The method of claim 4, wherein the set of FHE parametersare selected from a set of FHE scheme parameters associated with the FHElibrary and the FHE schema, wherein the set of FHE scheme parameterscomprises a cyclotomic polynomial, a degree of cyclotomic polynomial, amodulus for coefficients in plaintext, a plaintext modulus, a norm ofsecret key, a width of Gaussian distribution for sampling error and anerror distribution.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the set of FHEparameters and the optimal configuration for the set of FHE parametersare selected from the set of FHE scheme parameters based on a circuitdepth, a level of accuracy and the set of supporting features whereinthe circuit depth and the level of accuracy are determined based on amultiplication operation between a set of nodes in the meta model treeof the meta-models.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the multiobjective-multi constraint optimization task optimizes the set ofconstraints that comprises a minimize computation time τ, a memoryconsumption m, a communication cost comm and a computation cost of afunction F in a privacy preserving manner and is represented as follows:ℱ_(c_(†))^(*) = argmin  {ℱ_(j)^(c_(†))|ℱ_(j)^(c_(†)) = argmin  {{ℱ_(jk)^(c_(†))|λ_(j) > λ}_(kɛS_(l_(j))), l_(j)ɛℒ}  wherec_(†) ∈ Csuch that${\mathcal{F}_{jk}^{c_{\dagger}} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{|\mathcal{F}|}{\mathcal{F}_{ijk}^{c_{\dagger}}x_{ijk}}} \leq c_{\dagger\; f}}},{{\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{|\mathcal{F}|}x_{ijk}} = {\mathcal{F}}}$where, set of constraints is represented by C={τ,m,comm,ξ}, τ_(f) is thecomputation time,

is the memory consumption, comm_(f) is the communication cost, ξ_(f) isthe computation cost and λ is the security level,

is optimal instance model, F={f₁, f₂, f₃, . . . f_(n)}: Set ofsub-computations, F_(jk): Instance model generated using j^(th) FHElibrary and FHE scheme F*_(jk): Instance model generated using j^(th)FHE library and FHE scheme

: Optimal instance model based on constraint c_(†)∈C

: Optimal constraint for instance model F model using FHE library l_(j),where c_(†)∈C p_(q): Number of schemes supported by library I λ_(j):Security level for FHE library j α: Number of FHE libraries

={l₁ . . . l_(α)}: set of FHE libraries available |

|: Number of sub-functions f_(i)∈F: i^(th) sub computations of F

: Constraint to compute f_(i) using library l_(j) and FHE scheme S_(l)_(jk) , where c_(†)∈C W_(c) _(†) : User given priority for constraintcomputation time where time τ where c_(†)∈C$x_{ijk} = \left\{ \begin{matrix}1 & {{If}\mspace{14mu} f_{i}\mspace{14mu}{can}\mspace{14mu}{be}\mspace{14mu}{computed}\mspace{14mu}{using}\mspace{14mu}{library}\mspace{14mu} l_{j}\mspace{14mu}{and}\mspace{14mu}{FHE}\mspace{14mu}{scheme}\mspace{14mu} S_{l_{jk}}} \\0 & {otherwise}\end{matrix} \right.$
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the singleobjective-multi constraint optimization task comprises:${\mathcal{F}^{*} = {{argmin}\mspace{14mu}\left\{ {\left. F_{j} \middle| F_{j} \right. = {{argmin}\mspace{11mu}\left\{ F_{jk} \middle| {\lambda_{j} > \lambda} \right\}_{kɛS_{l_{j}}}l_{j}{ɛ\mathcal{L}}}} \right\}}},{F_{jk} = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{|\mathcal{F}|}{\mathcal{F}_{ijk}^{c_{\dagger}}x_{ijk}}}}$such thatF _(jk)=

_(τ) *f _(ijk) ^(τ)+_(m) *f _(ijk) ^(m)+

_(comm) *f _(ijk) ^(comm)+

_(ξ) *f _(ijk) ^(ξ),where

_(τ)+

_(m)+

_(comm)+

_(ξ)=1 and

x _(ijk) ≤c _(†f),

x _(ijk)=|

| where set of constraints is represented by C={τ,m,comm,ξ}, τ_(f) isthe computation time, ← is the memory consumption, comm_(f) is thecommunication cost, ξ_(f) is the computation cost and λ is the securitylevel,

is optimal instance model, F={f₁, f₂, f₃, . . . f_(n)}: Set ofsub-computations, F_(jk): Instance model generated using j^(th) FHElibrary and FHE scheme F*_(jk): Instance model generated using j^(th)FHE library and FHE scheme

: Optimal instance model based on constraint c_(†)∈C

: Optimal constraint for instance model F model using FHE library l_(j),where c_(†)∈C p_(q): Number of schemes supported by library I λ_(j):Security level for FHE library j α: Number of FHE libraries

={l₁ . . . l_(α)}: of FHE libraries available |

|: Number of sub-functions f_(i)∈F: i^(th) sub computations of F

: Constraint to compute f_(i) using library l_(j) and FHE scheme S_(l)_(jk) , where c_(†)∈C W_(c) _(†) : User given priority for constraintcomputation time where time τ where c_(†)∈C$x_{ijk} = \left\{ \begin{matrix}1 & {{If}\mspace{14mu} f_{i}\mspace{14mu}{can}\mspace{14mu}{be}\mspace{14mu}{computed}\mspace{14mu}{using}\mspace{14mu}{library}\mspace{14mu} l_{j}\mspace{14mu}{and}\mspace{14mu}{FHE}\mspace{14mu}{scheme}\mspace{14mu} S_{l_{jk}}} \\0 & {otherwise}\end{matrix} \right.$
 10. A system for enabling privacy in anapplication using fully homomorphic encryption (FHE), comprising: one ormore memories; one or more hardware processors; an input/outputinterface; and the one or more memories coupled to the one or morehardware processors, wherein the one or more hardware processors areconfigured to execute programmed instructions stored in the one or morememories to: receive the application, a set of input data to theapplication, a set of constraints and a user requirement, wherein theset of input data are indicative of one or more functions performed bythe application, the set of constraints are indicative of functionalperformance and cost of the application, and the user requirement isindicative of an optimization task to be performed as per a user'srequirement; generate, a set of inter-connected meta models based on anabstract data type (ADT) technique, wherein the set of inter-connectedmeta models comprises a plurality of meta model trees, wherein each ofthe plurality of meta model trees comprises a plurality of nodes thatindicate a fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) library, a FHEfunctionality associated with the FHE library and an optimalconfiguration of the associated FHE functionality; generate a set ofinstance models for the application based on the set of constraintsusing the set of inter-connected meta models, wherein each of the set ofinstance models comprises an FHE library, the FHE functionalityassociated with the FHE library and the optimal configuration of theassociated FHE functionality identified from the meta models based onthe set of constraints; optimize each of the set of instance modelsbased on the optimization task to obtain a decision for each of the setof constraints, wherein the optimization task is identified from a setof optimization tasks based on the user requirement, the set ofoptimization tasks comprises one of a multi objective-multi constraintoptimization task and a single objective-multi constraint optimizationtask; identify a pre-defined number of optimal instance models from theset of instance models using a ranking technique, wherein the rankingtechnique is performed based the set of constraints; and display anoptimal instance model, wherein the optimal instance model is indicativeof the privacy preservation using FHE to be enabled in the application.11. The system of claim 10, wherein the abstract data type (ADT)technique are implemented by the one or more hardware processors thatare further configured by the instructions to represent the inputapplication as a set of functions with a plurality of inter-connectednodes forming a tree structure based on a the computation treetechnique.
 12. The system of claim 10, wherein the multi objective-multiconstraint optimization task are implemented by the one or more hardwareprocessors that are further configured by the instructions to performoptimization task using the multi objective-multi constraintoptimization task as shown below:ℱ_(c_(†))^(*) = argmin  {ℱ_(j)^(c_(†))|ℱ_(j)^(c_(†)) = argmin  {{ℱ_(jk)^(c_(†))|λ_(j) > λ}_(kɛS_(l_(j))), l_(j)ɛℒ}  wherec_(†) ∈ Csuch that where,${\mathcal{F}_{jk}^{c_{\dagger}} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{|\mathcal{F}|}{\mathcal{F}_{ijk}^{c_{\dagger}}x_{ijk}}} \leq c_{\dagger\; f}}},{{\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{|\mathcal{F}|}x_{ijk}} = {\mathcal{F}}}$set of constraints is represented by C={τ, m,comm,ξ}, τ_(f) is thecomputation time,

is the memory consumption, comm_(f) is the communication cost, ξ_(f) isthe computation cost and λ is the security level,

is a optimal instance model, F={f₁, f₂, f₃, . . . f_(n)}: Set ofsub-computations, F_(jk): Instance model generated using j^(th) FHElibrary and FHE scheme F*_(jk): Instance model generated using j^(th)FHE library and FHE scheme

: Optimal instance model based on constraint c_(†)∈C

: Optimal constraint for instance model F model using FHE library l_(j),where c_(†)∈C p_(q): Number of schemes supported by library I λ_(j):Security level for FHE library j α: Number of FHE libraries

={l₁ . . . l_(α)}: set of FHE libraries available |

|: Number of sub-functions f_(i)∈F: i^(th) sub computations of F

: Constraint to compute f_(i) using library l_(j) and FHE scheme S_(l)_(jk) , where c_(†)∈C W_(c) _(†) : User given priority for constraintcomputation time where time τ where c_(†)∈C$x_{ijk} = \left\{ \begin{matrix}1 & {{If}\mspace{14mu} f_{i}\mspace{14mu}{can}\mspace{14mu}{be}\mspace{14mu}{computed}\mspace{14mu}{using}\mspace{14mu}{library}\mspace{14mu} l_{j}\mspace{14mu}{and}\mspace{14mu}{FHE}\mspace{14mu}{scheme}\mspace{14mu} S_{l_{jk}}} \\0 & {otherwise}\end{matrix} \right.$
 13. The system of claim 10, wherein the singleobjective-multi constraint optimization task are implemented by the oneor more hardware processors that are further configured by theinstructions to perform optimization task using the singleobjective-multi constraint optimization task as shown below:${\mathcal{F}^{*} = {{argmin}\mspace{14mu}\left\{ {\left. F_{j} \middle| F_{j} \right. = {{argmin}\mspace{11mu}\left\{ F_{jk} \middle| {\lambda_{j} > \lambda} \right\}_{kɛS_{l_{j}}}l_{j}{ɛ\mathcal{L}}}} \right\}}},{F_{jk} = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{|\mathcal{F}|}{\mathcal{F}_{ijk}^{c_{\dagger}}x_{ijk}}}}$such thatF _(jk)=

_(τ) *f _(ijk) ^(τ)+

_(m) +f _(ijk) ^(m)+

_(comm) *f _(ijk) ^(comm)+

_(ξ) *f _(ijk) ^(ξ),where

_(τ)+

_(m)+

_(comm)+

_(ξ)=1 and

x _(ijk) ≤c _(†f),

x _(ijk)=|

| where set of constraints is represented by C={τ, m,comm,ξ}, τ_(f) isthe computation time,

is the memory consumption, comm_(f) is the communication cost, ξ_(f) isthe computation cost and λ is the security level,

is optimal instance model, F={f₁, f₂, f₃, . . . f_(n)}: Set ofsub-computations, F_(jk): Instance model generated using j^(th) FHElibrary and FHE scheme F*_(jk): Instance model generated using j^(th)FHE library and FHE scheme

t: Optimal instance model based on constraint c_(†)∈C

: Optimal constraint for instance model F model using FHE library l_(j),where c_(†)∈C p_(q): Number of schemes supported by library I λ_(j):Security level for FHE library j α: Number of FHE libraries

={l₁ . . . l_(α)}: set of FHE libraries available |

|: Number of sub-functions f_(i)∈F: i^(th) sub computations of F

: Constraint to compute f_(i) using library l_(j) and FHE scheme S_(l)_(jk) , where c_(†)∈C W_(c) _(†) : User given priority for constraintcomputation time where time τ where c_(†)∈C$x_{ijk} = \left\{ \begin{matrix}1 & {{If}\mspace{14mu} f_{i}\mspace{14mu}{can}\mspace{14mu}{be}\mspace{14mu}{computed}\mspace{14mu}{using}\mspace{14mu}{library}\mspace{14mu} l_{j}\mspace{14mu}{and}\mspace{14mu}{FHE}\mspace{14mu}{scheme}\mspace{14mu} S_{l_{jk}}} \\0 & {otherwise}\end{matrix} \right.$
 14. The system of claim 10, wherein the selectionof set of FHE parameters and optimal configuration of the set of FHEparameters are implemented by the one or more hardware processors thatare further configured by the instructions to select the set of FHEparameters and the optimal configuration of the set of FHE parametersfrom the exhaustive set of FHE scheme parameters based on a circuitdepth, a level of accuracy and the set of supporting features whereinthe circuit depth and the level of accuracy is determined based on amultiplication operation between a set of nodes in the meta model treesof the meta-models.
 15. A computer program product comprising anon-transitory computer readable medium having a computer readableprogram embodied therein, wherein the computer readable program, whenexecuted on a computing device, causes the computing device to receivethe application, a set of input data to the application, a set ofconstraints and a user requirement, wherein the set of input data areindicative of one or more functions performed by the application, theset of constraints are indicative of functional performance and cost ofthe application, and the user requirement is indicative of anoptimization task to be performed as per a user's requirement; generate,a set of inter-connected meta models based on an abstract data type(ADT) technique, wherein the set of inter-connected meta modelscomprises a plurality of meta model trees, wherein each of the pluralityof meta model trees comprises a plurality of nodes that indicate a fullyhomomorphic encryption (FHE) library, a FHE functionality associatedwith the FHE library and an optimal configuration of the associated FHEfunctionality; generate a set of instance models for the applicationbased on the set of constraints using the set of inter-connected metamodels, wherein each of the set of instance models comprises an FHElibrary, the FHE functionality associated with the FHE library and theoptimal configuration of the associated FHE functionality identifiedfrom the meta models based on the set of constraints; optimize each ofthe set of instance models based on the optimization task to obtain adecision for each of the set of constraints, wherein the optimizationtask is identified from a set of optimization tasks based on the userrequirement, the set of optimization tasks comprises one of a multiobjective-multi constraint optimization task and a single objective-multi constraint optimization task; identify a pre-defined number ofoptimal instance models from the set of instance models using a rankingtechnique, wherein the ranking technique is performed based the set ofconstraints; and display an optimal instance model, wherein the optimalinstance model is indicative of the privacy preservation using FHE to beenabled in the application.